Emilee "Emma" Berger of Monroe Co. TN is truly a "Nothingberger"

This fugly freak of nature is Emilee "Emma" Burger, and it looks like she went to the Krusty Noem school for caking on makeup. At least she'll be in a place where she won't have to worry that she looks like puppy killing Noem's stunt double. 

https://www.local3news.com/local-news/tn-woman-charged-with-identity-theft-after-posting-registered-sex-offenders-warrant-online/article_3e6e6348-fa28-4116-999c-008c18da1f91.html

TN woman charged with identity theft after posting registered sex offender's warrant online

Addison Howard Mar 14, 2026

The Monroe County Sheriff's Office says one woman is charged with identity theft after deputies received word she posted a copy of an arrest warrant of a registered (person) on Facebook.

Sheriff Tommy Jones stated that Emilee "Emma" Berger posted a warrant for a (registered person, name redacted here) on a Facebook page titled "Uncensored Voices of Monroe County Revamped."... 

That document Berger posted, according to Sheriff Jones, contained personal information, including his Social Security number, date of birth, driver's license number, and full name.

Detectives later spoke with (the registrant), who confirmed he did not give anyone permission to publish his personal identifying information anywhere. They then reached out to Berger, who said she had redacted the identifying information after somebody told her about it, and then reposted the warrant with the personal information removed.

"However, the following day Ms. Berger created another post on the same Facebook page acknowledging that the warrant had originally been posted without the identifying information being redacted," Sheriff Jones wrote. "The copy of the warrant that appeared on Facebook contained a visible line through the document. Detectives determined that this line is automatically applied when documents are scanned into the Monroe County court system."

Since the original warrant does not contain that line, detectives believed that the copy posted on social media originated from the Monroe County Clerk of Court's electronic system and was transferred to Betger by someone who had authorized access to the system.

Investigators then had to try and figure out who accessed the document and sent it to Berger.

The county's clerk of court requested an audit of the court system from the time the warrant was signed and entered into the system until the time it appeared on social media. She found that two different authorized users had access to the document during the relevant timeframe, and neither was an employee of the sheriff's office nor the clerk of court's office. At this time, it has yet to be determined who the culprit is.

Sheriff Jones says his office will hand their findings off to "the appropriate authorities responsible" for furthering the investigation:

"While many county records are public records and can be viewed by the public, certain information contained within those records is protected by law and is not permitted to be publicly disclosed, including personal identifying information such as Social Security numbers and driver’s license numbers. Documents released through proper public channels have this information redacted to protect individuals from identity theft and fraud."

Deputies arrested Berger on Friday, March 13. 

A member of the Facebook group where the document was posted said they are disappointed the county prioritized putting this woman behind bars, referencing the sheriff's office arrest of a retired preacher who died while restrained for hours in a chair at the Monroe County Jail.

"Can't protect a 74 year old man but protection for Registered S** O** is a priority for 8 Monroe County Officers on a Friday night," the user posted. "Remember this when you vote."

Sheriff Jones says the public shouldn't always trust what they see on social media.

"The Monroe County Sheriff’s Office encourages the public to avoid relying on rumors or unverified information circulating on social media," he stated. "As always, we ask citizens to wait for accurate information released directly by the Monroe County Sheriff’s Office regarding ongoing investigations."

Fresno City Councilman and Yakuza game reject Miguel Arias THREATENS to prevent Registered persons from entering public buildings

At first I thought this loser was a rejected midboss
design from the Yakuza games.

In January 2026, 41-year-old Rene Campos, a Registered Person.  applied to run for the Fresno City Council’s District 7 seat. Campos had been convicted for a CP offense in 2018 and served 2 years on probation. Under current California and Fresno law, nothing bars sex offenders like him from running. District 3 Councilmember Miguel Arias even compared Campos to a high-profile sex trafficker sweeping the news. “I did hear some of the concerns of a potential future or former Epstein-type candidate coming to this dais,” Arias told Your Central Valley news in Fresno. “Any given Thursday, we have kids in this room. We have families.”

Of course, the first question is whether Fresno can even do that? Fresno is a “Charter City,” which means that, unlike “general law cities” that are restriction only to the general laws governing municipalities in the state, a Charter City has a lot of leeway in creatin and enforcing their own rules and regulations. As noted in a ummary by US Berkley, “Article XI, section 3(a) of the California Constitution authorizes the adoption of a city charter and provides such a charter has the force and effect of state law. Article XI, section 5(a), the ‘home rule’ provision, affirmatively grants to charter cities supremacy over "municipal affairs." However, the California Constitution does not define the term ‘municipal affair.’... Whether a given activity is a municipal affair over which a city has sovereignty, or a statewide concern, over which the legislature has authority, is a legal determination for the courts to resolve. Thus, the determination of whether a given activity is a municipal affair or statewide concern is done on a case-by-case basis. The court's determination will depend on the particular facts and circumstances of each case. Keep in mind that the concept of ‘municipal affairs’ is a fluid one that changes over time as local issues become statewide concerns”. – (Source: UC Berkley, “Foundational Aspects of Charter Cities.” https://www.law.berkeley.edu/files/Albuquerque3_-_Foundational_Aspects_of_Charter_Cities.pdf). In short, This power is limited only by the charter itself and by statutes (state laws) on matters of statewide concern.

While a lawsuit would likely have to be filed to determine whether allowing certain people to run for public office is a municipal affair or a government interest, the California Supreme Court had made previous rulings that limited a community’s ability to limit the lives of Registrants. In 2014, the Fourth Appellate District of the California Court of Appeal, in People v. Nguyen, 222 Cal. App. 4th 1168 (2014), held that a local ordinance making it a misdemeanor for registered persons to enter a park where children regularly gather without permission from law enforcement is preempted by state law. Specifically, the Court found that the legislature enacted a comprehensive statutory scheme that “Fully Occupies the Field”. This means that even if the state did not specifically state that municipalities cannot state in their statutes that municipalities cannot pass their own ordinances regulating the lives of Registered Persons, “The Legislature expressly declared its intent to establish a comprehensive and standardized system for regulating s*x o**enders when it passed the S*x O**ender Punishment, Control, and Containment Act of 2006... Considering the Legislature's declared intent coupled with the scope and nature of the restrictions the foregoing Penal Code sections imposed, we conclude the Legislature established a complete system for regulating a s*x o**ender's daily life and manifested a legislative intent to fully occupy the field to the exclusion of Section 4–14–803 and other local regulations.   Considered as a whole, these statutes regulate much more than the geographic restrictions imposed on a sex offender.   They regulate numerous aspects of a s*x o**ender's life so that both law enforcement and the public can monitor the s*x o**ender on a daily basis.”

Campos told FOX26 he deserves a second chance and has taken the necessary steps to reintegrate into society: “A constant battle of proving and proving and proving. How far does the person have to go before they have rehabilitated? When is it enough? How far does the person have to go? I stand in front of Fresno City Council and still they don't believe in the very laws they're pushing,” When asked about the proposed legislation to block his candidacy, Campos said: “My focus is District 7. However, this this reaches way further than Fresno, California, and so forth. The more people you put in a box, the easier it is to put the next person in a box.” 

ABC30 Action News then reported that “Fresno City Leaders are moving forward with plans for an ordinance that would bar a potential council candidate, who is a registered (person), from being able to enter various city facilities. That candidate is now pushing back. ‘The constitution does not grant government the authority to pre-select who is worthy of democracy. Voters decide, not councils, not rhetoric, not fear,’ says Rene Campos.” In response,  Miguel Arias, Fresno City Councilman, threatened, “We're not going to allow our city to be represented by s*x o**enders. We have limits around state law that we can't control, but there is a lot of control that we do have locally... We have plenty of broad authority and ability to limit access.”  Council Member Miguel Arias says the city intends to extend those restrictions with an ordinance that would bar any registered s*x o**ender from city facilities like council chambers, community centers, police and fire stations.

-- So, Miguel's so dumb he wants to bar Registered Persons even from the Registration office? What a tool. 

If this ordinance passes, Fresno gets sued, they lose the case then offer a huge settlement. Easy money!

Honestly I had to make sure this was Fresco CA and that there's no Fresno in FloriDUH. 

Maybe Miguel WAS mentioned in the Yakuza games after all