Emilee "Emma" Berger of Monroe Co. TN is truly a "Nothingberger"

This fugly freak of nature is Emilee "Emma" Burger, and it looks like she went to the Krusty Noem school for caking on makeup. At least she'll be in a place where she won't have to worry that she looks like puppy killing Noem's stunt double. 

https://www.local3news.com/local-news/tn-woman-charged-with-identity-theft-after-posting-registered-sex-offenders-warrant-online/article_3e6e6348-fa28-4116-999c-008c18da1f91.html

TN woman charged with identity theft after posting registered sex offender's warrant online

Addison Howard Mar 14, 2026

The Monroe County Sheriff's Office says one woman is charged with identity theft after deputies received word she posted a copy of an arrest warrant of a registered (person) on Facebook.

Sheriff Tommy Jones stated that Emilee "Emma" Berger posted a warrant for a (registered person, name redacted here) on a Facebook page titled "Uncensored Voices of Monroe County Revamped."... 

That document Berger posted, according to Sheriff Jones, contained personal information, including his Social Security number, date of birth, driver's license number, and full name.

Detectives later spoke with (the registrant), who confirmed he did not give anyone permission to publish his personal identifying information anywhere. They then reached out to Berger, who said she had redacted the identifying information after somebody told her about it, and then reposted the warrant with the personal information removed.

"However, the following day Ms. Berger created another post on the same Facebook page acknowledging that the warrant had originally been posted without the identifying information being redacted," Sheriff Jones wrote. "The copy of the warrant that appeared on Facebook contained a visible line through the document. Detectives determined that this line is automatically applied when documents are scanned into the Monroe County court system."

Since the original warrant does not contain that line, detectives believed that the copy posted on social media originated from the Monroe County Clerk of Court's electronic system and was transferred to Betger by someone who had authorized access to the system.

Investigators then had to try and figure out who accessed the document and sent it to Berger.

The county's clerk of court requested an audit of the court system from the time the warrant was signed and entered into the system until the time it appeared on social media. She found that two different authorized users had access to the document during the relevant timeframe, and neither was an employee of the sheriff's office nor the clerk of court's office. At this time, it has yet to be determined who the culprit is.

Sheriff Jones says his office will hand their findings off to "the appropriate authorities responsible" for furthering the investigation:

"While many county records are public records and can be viewed by the public, certain information contained within those records is protected by law and is not permitted to be publicly disclosed, including personal identifying information such as Social Security numbers and driver’s license numbers. Documents released through proper public channels have this information redacted to protect individuals from identity theft and fraud."

Deputies arrested Berger on Friday, March 13. 

A member of the Facebook group where the document was posted said they are disappointed the county prioritized putting this woman behind bars, referencing the sheriff's office arrest of a retired preacher who died while restrained for hours in a chair at the Monroe County Jail.

"Can't protect a 74 year old man but protection for Registered S** O** is a priority for 8 Monroe County Officers on a Friday night," the user posted. "Remember this when you vote."

Sheriff Jones says the public shouldn't always trust what they see on social media.

"The Monroe County Sheriff’s Office encourages the public to avoid relying on rumors or unverified information circulating on social media," he stated. "As always, we ask citizens to wait for accurate information released directly by the Monroe County Sheriff’s Office regarding ongoing investigations."

Fresno City Councilman and Yakuza game reject Miguel Arias THREATENS to prevent Registered persons from entering public buildings

At first I thought this loser was a rejected midboss
design from the Yakuza games.

In January 2026, 41-year-old Rene Campos, a Registered Person.  applied to run for the Fresno City Council’s District 7 seat. Campos had been convicted for a CP offense in 2018 and served 2 years on probation. Under current California and Fresno law, nothing bars sex offenders like him from running. District 3 Councilmember Miguel Arias even compared Campos to a high-profile sex trafficker sweeping the news. “I did hear some of the concerns of a potential future or former Epstein-type candidate coming to this dais,” Arias told Your Central Valley news in Fresno. “Any given Thursday, we have kids in this room. We have families.”

Of course, the first question is whether Fresno can even do that? Fresno is a “Charter City,” which means that, unlike “general law cities” that are restriction only to the general laws governing municipalities in the state, a Charter City has a lot of leeway in creatin and enforcing their own rules and regulations. As noted in a ummary by US Berkley, “Article XI, section 3(a) of the California Constitution authorizes the adoption of a city charter and provides such a charter has the force and effect of state law. Article XI, section 5(a), the ‘home rule’ provision, affirmatively grants to charter cities supremacy over "municipal affairs." However, the California Constitution does not define the term ‘municipal affair.’... Whether a given activity is a municipal affair over which a city has sovereignty, or a statewide concern, over which the legislature has authority, is a legal determination for the courts to resolve. Thus, the determination of whether a given activity is a municipal affair or statewide concern is done on a case-by-case basis. The court's determination will depend on the particular facts and circumstances of each case. Keep in mind that the concept of ‘municipal affairs’ is a fluid one that changes over time as local issues become statewide concerns”. – (Source: UC Berkley, “Foundational Aspects of Charter Cities.” https://www.law.berkeley.edu/files/Albuquerque3_-_Foundational_Aspects_of_Charter_Cities.pdf). In short, This power is limited only by the charter itself and by statutes (state laws) on matters of statewide concern.

While a lawsuit would likely have to be filed to determine whether allowing certain people to run for public office is a municipal affair or a government interest, the California Supreme Court had made previous rulings that limited a community’s ability to limit the lives of Registrants. In 2014, the Fourth Appellate District of the California Court of Appeal, in People v. Nguyen, 222 Cal. App. 4th 1168 (2014), held that a local ordinance making it a misdemeanor for registered persons to enter a park where children regularly gather without permission from law enforcement is preempted by state law. Specifically, the Court found that the legislature enacted a comprehensive statutory scheme that “Fully Occupies the Field”. This means that even if the state did not specifically state that municipalities cannot state in their statutes that municipalities cannot pass their own ordinances regulating the lives of Registered Persons, “The Legislature expressly declared its intent to establish a comprehensive and standardized system for regulating s*x o**enders when it passed the S*x O**ender Punishment, Control, and Containment Act of 2006... Considering the Legislature's declared intent coupled with the scope and nature of the restrictions the foregoing Penal Code sections imposed, we conclude the Legislature established a complete system for regulating a s*x o**ender's daily life and manifested a legislative intent to fully occupy the field to the exclusion of Section 4–14–803 and other local regulations.   Considered as a whole, these statutes regulate much more than the geographic restrictions imposed on a sex offender.   They regulate numerous aspects of a s*x o**ender's life so that both law enforcement and the public can monitor the s*x o**ender on a daily basis.”

Campos told FOX26 he deserves a second chance and has taken the necessary steps to reintegrate into society: “A constant battle of proving and proving and proving. How far does the person have to go before they have rehabilitated? When is it enough? How far does the person have to go? I stand in front of Fresno City Council and still they don't believe in the very laws they're pushing,” When asked about the proposed legislation to block his candidacy, Campos said: “My focus is District 7. However, this this reaches way further than Fresno, California, and so forth. The more people you put in a box, the easier it is to put the next person in a box.” 

ABC30 Action News then reported that “Fresno City Leaders are moving forward with plans for an ordinance that would bar a potential council candidate, who is a registered (person), from being able to enter various city facilities. That candidate is now pushing back. ‘The constitution does not grant government the authority to pre-select who is worthy of democracy. Voters decide, not councils, not rhetoric, not fear,’ says Rene Campos.” In response,  Miguel Arias, Fresno City Councilman, threatened, “We're not going to allow our city to be represented by s*x o**enders. We have limits around state law that we can't control, but there is a lot of control that we do have locally... We have plenty of broad authority and ability to limit access.”  Council Member Miguel Arias says the city intends to extend those restrictions with an ordinance that would bar any registered s*x o**ender from city facilities like council chambers, community centers, police and fire stations.

-- So, Miguel's so dumb he wants to bar Registered Persons even from the Registration office? What a tool. 

If this ordinance passes, Fresno gets sued, they lose the case then offer a huge settlement. Easy money!

Honestly I had to make sure this was Fresco CA and that there's no Fresno in FloriDUH. 

Maybe Miguel WAS mentioned in the Yakuza games after all

David Martinez of Ft. Worth TX severely overestimates his intelligence by taking credit for a bad law that had little to do with him

Here is David Martinez low-key admitting he lacks virtue

David Martinez of Ft. Worth TX reminds me a lot of tRump, taking credit for things in which he has little to no part in its creation. And so Ft. Worth passed a residency restriction law that will surely lead to a costly lawsuit. And here's this literal nobody acting like he did anything of note. (Ft. Worth council was going to pass it with or without this loser.)

Since I couldn't post a message myself, I has the fine folks running the Facebook account for OnceFallen to say the following:

"You're intentionally misleading people in a way to get them arrested and/or you simply can’t read/comprehend the law and cannot admit you have no clue what you are talking about. 

1. The law can't be applied to everyone currently living where they are living. It is called a grandfather clause. If you start harassing a person living at their current residence, then that is harassment and you will get arrested and/or sued into oblivion. 

2. There is no anti-loitering or presence restrictions in the ordinance; it only covers residence and it only covers those who move into the city or move from the current residence after the law will take effect. 

3. You aren't going to "save thousands of children" because the vast majority of sex crimes occur in the home, by someone known to the victim, and by someone with no prior sex offense record. Residency restriction laws have been proven long ago to have ABSOLUTELY NO IMPACT on sex offenses. 

4. Oh, there was never a prior 1000 foot restriction."

You see, Ft. Worth had NO residency or presence restrictions in place before the Ft. Worth city counil passed a 2000 ft residency restriction their own city attorney warned would make 98% of the city off-limits to Registered Persons looking to live in Ft. Worth. Hope they get sued!

But there was never a presence or anti-loitering restriction, and Ft. Worth did not pass such a presence or anti-loitering restricion, only a residency restriction. 

But I found quite a few screenshots showing this David Martinez fellow is the worst kind of moron. He's a pseudo-intellectual. He talks as if he is smart but instead he just spews batshit conspracies that pull back the veil on his bigotry and hatred for the disadvantaged:

Here is Davis looking to throw the unhoused out of his community. 

David bullies little old ladies by his own admission and actions

Here is David pushing an insane conspiracy theory

Here is Davis engaging in Predator Panic (tm)

Here he is encouraging vigilante violence

David is a Zionist and regularly accuses others of being anti-semitic. 

David Martinez, in my opinion, is a batshit conspiracy therorist, no different than Alex Jones. Davis is also a clown that only claims minority heritage when he needs a little sympathy. But the reality is he's a bully and a bigot. It is no wonder why his Facebook page says he's still single. 

Hey David, from one man with Indigenous heritage to another, lay off the firewater!

US Rep. Tim Burchett wants to "execute" certain people but apparently doesn't understand how the law actually works

I usually try to come up with a witty remark or two about the idiots that I feature on this blog, but I'm recovering from the flu, so I'll be lazy and just add some screenshots of other insults people made.

Of course, this has to be taken with a grain of salt because his focus is not on the many Republicans and assorded wealthy Republican donors in the files. He's focused primarily on the Clintons. But if all these allegations are true, then everyone should be tried in a court of law regardless of party affiliation. And they should be held to the same standard of "justice" that they enforce on the poor. 

But here is why the comment below is stupid. First, Kennedy v. Louisiana, 554 U.S. 407 (2008) ended death penalty for any offenses that do not involve murder. Yes, states are passing legislation to make certain sexual offenses eligible for the death penalty. However, they're illegal, and mostly symbolic, a Hail Mary campaign slogan from the laughable failure that was the 2024 Ron DeathSantis presidential campaign. (LOL at Christina Pushaw for her performance as the worst campaign manager in US history.) Thus, there have been no persons convicted of sex offenses that do not involve murder sitting on death row for 30 years. 

So, are these executions he is calling for include the majority of the tRump admiistration?

https://wabcradio.com/2026/02/14/we-need-to-execute-them-rep-burchett-after-seeing-the-un-redacted-epstein-files/

Rep. Tim Burchett made explosive remarks regarding the still-sealed files tied to Jeffrey Epstein, saying the full, unredacted documents would “haunt you for the rest of your life.”

Speaking about crimes involving minors, Burchett argued the country needs the “guts” to carry out executions for convicted child predators.

“It’s the truth! We need to execute them. We need to quit with this nonsense of them sitting on death row for 30 years,” Burchett said.

He went further, describing the crimes as “evil” and “satanic,” adding that those responsible would “go straight to the pits of hell.”

The Epstein case continues to fuel political debate as lawmakers on both sides push for greater transparency surrounding sealed records and the identities of individuals connected to the late financier.

COVID Conspiracy nut and Opponent of Affordable Healthcare, US Rep. Greg Steube, wants to eliminate Medicaid and healthcare tax credits for Persons Forced to Register

Greg Steube, Republican & Floridiot, wants to ban ALL Registered Persons from obtaining Medicaid AND eliminate tax credits under the Affordable Care Act. This isn’t the first time that Congress had targeted RPs from government assistance. In 2010, Congress passed a bill banning RPs from obtaining Small Business Loans from the Small Business Administration; they had also tried passing legislation in 2010 banning RPs from receiving Federal Housing Loans and Unemployment Compensation but both failed to fully advance in time. (Both passed the House but failed to advance in the Senate.) Under this current administration, this has a better chance of passing. Of course, Trump and his cronies will continue to gt the best healthcare money can buy, while RPs and their families will be forced to suffer without adequate healthcare.

Steuben has been a staunch opponent of the Affordable Care Act. During thre COVID-19 Pandemic, he was also among those conspiacy theorists claiming that the “deep state” at the FDA was preventing the use of hydroxychloroquine, an antimalarial drug, to treat COVID-19. Medical experts note that hydroxychloroquine neither treats nor prevents infection by COVID-19. He is also a defender of the J6 insurrection & promotes the conspiracy that the 2020 was “stolen.” (I'm generally not a fan of Wikipedia but in this instance, they've done a good job of covering this assclown's voting record.)

He was also accessed of impropriety for possible illegal work while acting as a lobbyist. 

The bill is HR 7453 (119th Congress, 2025-2026)

(Source: Rep. Steube: No ACA or Medicaid for Sex Offenders.” Rep. Greg Steube. 2/10/2026. https://steube.house.gov/press-releases/rep-steube-no-aca-or-medicaid-for-sex-offenders/)

U.S. Representative Greg Steube (R-Fla.) introduced yesterday the Criminals’ Loss of Eligibility and Assistance Networks Act or CLEAN Act. This bill prohibits sex offenders from receiving federally funded Medicaid benefits as well as the refundable tax credit for health insurance under the Affordable Care Act. 

“Sex offenders have no business tapping into programs intended for lower-income and disadvantaged Americans,” said Rep. Steube. “Taxpayers have the right to know their hard-earned money is not being used to cover the medical expenses of serial abusers and criminals. Rapists and abusers have no business receiving federal benefits. My bill will protect Medicaid and ACA assistance for law-abiding Americans by barring sex offenders from accessing these programs.” 

Background: The CLEAN Act amends the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit sex offenders from receiving the refundable tax credit for coverage with a qualified health plan under the Affordable Care Act. It also amends the Social Security Act to make sex offenders ineligible for federally funded benefits under Medicaid. 

Paula Martinelli thinks a Registered Person should be "removed from society"

Paula Martinelli was married to a man for more than 18 years and is now seeking a divorce from him. She turned him in for having illicit photos, but it is her statement, backed by loudmouth victim advocates making dubious claims, that leads to her appearance on this blog. 

“I’m the person who found the screen,” Martinelli said. “I’m the one who reported him, and I have been fully supportive of him being removed from society.”

(I typically cite a link but the link contains extremely offensive language, so CLICK HERE if you want the original source. )

Deranged Lakemoor, IL man breaks into a home to spy on Registered Person while making homemade explosives

I guess you can say that Joseph A. Savino's plans... blew up in his face. 

https://www.lakemchenryscanner.com/2026/01/07/lakemoor-man-accused-of-creating-homemade-bomb-with-intent-to-blow-up-alleged-sex-offender/

Lakemoor man accused of creating homemade bomb with intent to blow up alleged sex offender

by Sam Borcia

Published January 7, 2026 11:37 AM

Prosecutors say a Lakemoor man created a homemade explosive device, which required the bomb squad to respond, and they believe he intended to blow up an alleged (Registered Person).

Joseph A. Savino, 43, of Lakemoor, was charged with one count of possession of an explosive or incendiary device, a Class 1 felony.

The Lakemoor Police Department responded on October 18 to the 31800 block of Darrell Road in Lakemoor for a report of a burglary.

Lake County Assistant State’s Attorney Michael Theis said a caretaker arrived at the home and found the back door open with miscellaneous items on the porch.

Officers located a plastic bag and a canvas bag hanging on the handle of the back door.

A note was left on the door frame that said, “I will ree pant if you want” and “there is a child m**ester right down the street look him up.” Savino’s inmate identification card was recovered at the scene, Theis said.

The door was open and inside the residence there was spray paint on the walls consisting of letters and artwork.

Officers took the bags back to the police department where an inventory search was performed.

Theis said an officer located a black bag inside a plastic bag that contained what was later determined to be a homemade explosive device.

The bomb squad was called to the department and they X-rayed the device and confirmed it could be detonated with a flame on the wick.

The X-ray showed there were nails in the device that would act as projectiles if the device were detonated, Theis said.

The bomb squad removed the device and transported it to a controlled environment where they confirmed it was a working device.

Savino was transported to the Lakemoor Police Department on November 24 after being arrested for felony retail theft.

Theis said Savino was interviewed regarding the explosive device case and said he made the device for the purpose of “shooting it off to watch the colors.”

Savino said he went to the house on Darrell Road and was using the home for surveillance of the (registrant), Theis said.

Savino said he had been to the house a few times to surveil the (Registrant) and admitted to using confetti popper in front of the (registrant’s) house.

Savino also admitted to writing and leaving the note and admitted that everything in the bags belonged to him, Theis said.

The crime lab located fingerprints on the components of the device after it was disassembled by the bomb squad.

Theis said the owner of the home on Darrell Road told officers they did not know Savino and did not give him permission to be in the residence.

“This defendant is showing a fixation on an alleged (registrant) that is supposed to live in his neighborhood. He broke into a house and used it as a surveillance post so he could watch the (registrant),” Theis said.